Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads with 5.7% higher average benchmark score. Claude Sonnet 4.5 offers 34.6K more tokens in context window than DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp. DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp is $17.32 cheaper per million tokens. Claude Sonnet 4.5 supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Claude Sonnet 4.5 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4.5 was developed to bridge human thinking and machine assistance, allowing people to work with language and tools in a more conversational and natural way. Built with a focus on turning ideas into results, it represents an evolution in making AI feel less mechanical while maintaining strong capabilities across reasoning, coding, and collaborative tasks.
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp was introduced as an experimental release, designed to test new architectural innovations and training methodologies. Built to explore the boundaries of mixture-of-experts design, it serves as a research preview for techniques that may be incorporated into future stable releases.
Launched on the same date

Claude Sonnet 4.5
Anthropic
2025-09-29

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp
DeepSeek
2025-09-29
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude Sonnet 4.5

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks

Claude Sonnet 4.5

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories

Claude Sonnet 4.5

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp
Claude Sonnet 4.5
2025-01-31
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude Sonnet 4.5
Anthropic
ZeroEval


Claude Sonnet 4.5

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp

Claude Sonnet 4.5

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp
Novita
ZeroEval