Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads with 23.6% higher average benchmark score. Claude Sonnet 4.5 offers 8.0K more tokens in context window than Devstral Small 1.1. Devstral Small 1.1 is $17.60 cheaper per million tokens. Claude Sonnet 4.5 supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Claude Sonnet 4.5 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4.5 was developed to bridge human thinking and machine assistance, allowing people to work with language and tools in a more conversational and natural way. Built with a focus on turning ideas into results, it represents an evolution in making AI feel less mechanical while maintaining strong capabilities across reasoning, coding, and collaborative tasks.
Mistral AI
Devstral Small was developed as a more efficient development-focused model, designed to bring software engineering assistance to resource-conscious deployments. Built to provide coding capabilities with reduced computational requirements, it enables developer tools in environments where efficiency is paramount.
2 months newer

Devstral Small 1.1
Mistral AI
2025-07-11

Claude Sonnet 4.5
Anthropic
2025-09-29
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Devstral Small 1.1
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Devstral Small 1.1
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Devstral Small 1.1
Claude Sonnet 4.5
2025-01-31
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude Sonnet 4.5
Anthropic
ZeroEval


Claude Sonnet 4.5

Devstral Small 1.1

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Devstral Small 1.1
Devstral Small 1.1
Mistral AI