Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads with 55.5% higher average benchmark score. Claude Sonnet 4.5 offers 223.0K more tokens in context window than Gemini 1.0 Pro. Gemini 1.0 Pro is $16.00 cheaper per million tokens. Claude Sonnet 4.5 supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Claude Sonnet 4.5 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4.5 was developed to bridge human thinking and machine assistance, allowing people to work with language and tools in a more conversational and natural way. Built with a focus on turning ideas into results, it represents an evolution in making AI feel less mechanical while maintaining strong capabilities across reasoning, coding, and collaborative tasks.
Gemini 1.0 Pro was developed as Google's initial production-ready multimodal model, designed to handle text and provide strong performance across diverse tasks. Built to serve as a versatile foundation for applications requiring reliable language understanding and generation, it introduced the Gemini architecture to developers and enterprises.
1 year newer

Gemini 1.0 Pro
2024-02-15

Claude Sonnet 4.5
Anthropic
2025-09-29
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Gemini 1.0 Pro
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Gemini 1.0 Pro
Gemini 1.0 Pro
2024-02-01
Claude Sonnet 4.5
2025-01-31
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude Sonnet 4.5
Anthropic
ZeroEval


Claude Sonnet 4.5

Gemini 1.0 Pro

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Gemini 1.0 Pro
Gemini 1.0 Pro