Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads with 33.9% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite offers 850.1K more tokens in context window than Claude Sonnet 4.5. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is $17.50 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Claude Sonnet 4.5 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4.5 was developed to bridge human thinking and machine assistance, allowing people to work with language and tools in a more conversational and natural way. Built with a focus on turning ideas into results, it represents an evolution in making AI feel less mechanical while maintaining strong capabilities across reasoning, coding, and collaborative tasks.
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite was created as the most efficient option in the Gemini 2.5 family, designed to provide cutting-edge capabilities with minimal computational overhead. Built for applications where cost and latency are primary concerns, it extends advanced multimodal understanding to resource-conscious deployments.
3 months newer

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
2025-06-17

Claude Sonnet 4.5
Anthropic
2025-09-29
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
2025-01-01
Claude Sonnet 4.5
2025-01-31
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude Sonnet 4.5
Anthropic
ZeroEval


Claude Sonnet 4.5

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite