Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads with 6.1% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Pro offers 850.1K more tokens in context window than Claude Sonnet 4.5. Gemini 2.5 Pro is $6.75 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Claude Sonnet 4.5 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4.5 was developed to bridge human thinking and machine assistance, allowing people to work with language and tools in a more conversational and natural way. Built with a focus on turning ideas into results, it represents an evolution in making AI feel less mechanical while maintaining strong capabilities across reasoning, coding, and collaborative tasks.
Gemini 2.5 Pro was developed as Google's most intelligent AI model, designed to comprehend vast datasets and challenging problems from diverse information sources including text, audio, images, and video. Built to handle complex reasoning and multi-step problem solving, it represents Google's flagship offering for enterprise and advanced applications.
4 months newer

Gemini 2.5 Pro
2025-05-20

Claude Sonnet 4.5
Anthropic
2025-09-29
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Gemini 2.5 Pro
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Gemini 2.5 Pro
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Gemini 2.5 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5
2025-01-31
Gemini 2.5 Pro
2025-01-31
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude Sonnet 4.5
Anthropic
ZeroEval


Claude Sonnet 4.5

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro
ZeroEval