+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Gemma 3 27B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads with 41.0% higher average benchmark score. Claude Sonnet 4.5 offers 1.9K more tokens in context window than Gemma 3 27B. Gemma 3 27B is $17.70 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Claude Sonnet 4.5 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4.5 was developed to bridge human thinking and machine assistance, allowing people to work with language and tools in a more conversational and natural way. Built with a focus on turning ideas into results, it represents an evolution in making AI feel less mechanical while maintaining strong capabilities across reasoning, coding, and collaborative tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B represents the largest variant in the Gemma 3 family, developed to provide flagship-level open-source capabilities. Built with advanced training methodologies and 27 billion parameters, it offers researchers and developers access to powerful language understanding without proprietary restrictions.
6 months newer
Gemma 3 27B
2025-03-12
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Anthropic
2025-09-29
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Input:$3.00
Output:$15.00
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.20($17.70 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Average Score:83.4%(+41.0%)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Average Score:42.4%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Claude Sonnet 4.5
2025-01-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude Sonnet 4.5
2 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Avg Score:83.4%(+41.0%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Avg Score:42.4%
Providers:2