Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads with 67.6% higher average benchmark score. Claude Sonnet 4.5 offers 200.0K more tokens in context window than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed. Claude Sonnet 4.5 is $42.00 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Claude Sonnet 4.5 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4.5 was developed to bridge human thinking and machine assistance, allowing people to work with language and tools in a more conversational and natural way. Built with a focus on turning ideas into results, it represents an evolution in making AI feel less mechanical while maintaining strong capabilities across reasoning, coding, and collaborative tasks.
Gemma 3N E4B IT was created as the instruction-tuned version of Gemma 3N E4B, designed to combine improved capability with edge optimization. Built for applications requiring both responsive instruction-following and edge-friendly efficiency, it serves as a stronger option for on-device AI assistants.
3 months newer

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
2025-06-26

Claude Sonnet 4.5
Anthropic
2025-09-29
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
2024-06-01
Claude Sonnet 4.5
2025-01-31
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude Sonnet 4.5
Anthropic
ZeroEval


Claude Sonnet 4.5

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Together