Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads with 9.2% higher average benchmark score. Claude Sonnet 4.5 offers 1.9K more tokens in context window than GLM-4.5. GLM-4.5 is $16.00 cheaper per million tokens. Claude Sonnet 4.5 supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Claude Sonnet 4.5 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4.5 was developed to bridge human thinking and machine assistance, allowing people to work with language and tools in a more conversational and natural way. Built with a focus on turning ideas into results, it represents an evolution in making AI feel less mechanical while maintaining strong capabilities across reasoning, coding, and collaborative tasks.
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.5 was developed by Zhipu AI as an advanced bilingual language model, designed to excel at both Chinese and English language tasks. Built to serve diverse applications across multiple languages, it represents Zhipu AI's commitment to multilingual AI capabilities.
2 months newer
GLM-4.5
Zhipu AI
2025-07-28

Claude Sonnet 4.5
Anthropic
2025-09-29
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude Sonnet 4.5
GLM-4.5
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks

Claude Sonnet 4.5
GLM-4.5
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories

Claude Sonnet 4.5
GLM-4.5
Claude Sonnet 4.5
2025-01-31
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude Sonnet 4.5
Anthropic
ZeroEval
GLM-4.5

Claude Sonnet 4.5
GLM-4.5

Claude Sonnet 4.5
GLM-4.5
DeepInfra
Novita
ZeroEval