Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads with 3.5% higher average benchmark score. Claude Sonnet 4.5 offers 67.4K more tokens in context window than GLM-4.6. GLM-4.6 is $15.40 cheaper per million tokens. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4.5 was developed to bridge human thinking and machine assistance, allowing people to work with language and tools in a more conversational and natural way. Built with a focus on turning ideas into results, it represents an evolution in making AI feel less mechanical while maintaining strong capabilities across reasoning, coding, and collaborative tasks.
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.6 was introduced as an enhanced iteration of the GLM-4 series, designed to provide improved capabilities in bilingual language understanding and generation. Built to incorporate refinements to the GLM architecture, it represents continued advancement in Zhipu AI's model development.
1 days newer

Claude Sonnet 4.5
Anthropic
2025-09-29
GLM-4.6
Zhipu AI
2025-09-30
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude Sonnet 4.5
GLM-4.6
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks

Claude Sonnet 4.5
GLM-4.6
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories

Claude Sonnet 4.5
GLM-4.6
Claude Sonnet 4.5
2025-01-31
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude Sonnet 4.5
Anthropic
ZeroEval
GLM-4.6

Claude Sonnet 4.5
GLM-4.6

Claude Sonnet 4.5
GLM-4.6
DeepInfra
ZeroEval