Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads with 41.7% higher average benchmark score. Claude Sonnet 4.5 offers 8.0K more tokens in context window than Llama 3.1 70B Instruct. Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is $17.60 cheaper per million tokens. Claude Sonnet 4.5 supports multimodal inputs. Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is available on 9 providers. Overall, Claude Sonnet 4.5 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4.5 was developed to bridge human thinking and machine assistance, allowing people to work with language and tools in a more conversational and natural way. Built with a focus on turning ideas into results, it represents an evolution in making AI feel less mechanical while maintaining strong capabilities across reasoning, coding, and collaborative tasks.
Meta
Llama 3.1 70B was created as a balanced open-source model, designed to provide strong performance with 70 billion parameters while remaining practical for many deployment scenarios. Built to serve as a versatile foundation for fine-tuning and application development, it combines capability with accessibility in the open-source ecosystem.
1 year newer

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Meta
2024-07-23

Claude Sonnet 4.5
Anthropic
2025-09-29
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Claude Sonnet 4.5
2025-01-31
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude Sonnet 4.5
Anthropic
ZeroEval


Claude Sonnet 4.5

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Bedrock
Cerebras
DeepInfra
Fireworks
Groq
Hyperbolic
Lambda
Sambanova
Together