Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads with 50.6% higher average benchmark score. Claude Sonnet 4.5 offers 8.0K more tokens in context window than Llama 3.2 3B Instruct. Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is $17.97 cheaper per million tokens. Claude Sonnet 4.5 supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Claude Sonnet 4.5 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4.5 was developed to bridge human thinking and machine assistance, allowing people to work with language and tools in a more conversational and natural way. Built with a focus on turning ideas into results, it represents an evolution in making AI feel less mechanical while maintaining strong capabilities across reasoning, coding, and collaborative tasks.
Meta
Llama 3.2 3B was created as an ultra-compact open-source model, designed to enable on-device and edge deployment scenarios. Built with just 3 billion parameters while retaining instruction-following abilities, it brings Meta's language technology to mobile devices, IoT applications, and resource-constrained environments.
1 year newer

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25

Claude Sonnet 4.5
Anthropic
2025-09-29
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Claude Sonnet 4.5
2025-01-31
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude Sonnet 4.5
Anthropic
ZeroEval


Claude Sonnet 4.5

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
DeepInfra