Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads with 36.7% higher average benchmark score. Claude Sonnet 4.5 offers 8.0K more tokens in context window than Llama 3.2 90B Instruct. Llama 3.2 90B Instruct is $17.25 cheaper per million tokens. Llama 3.2 90B Instruct is available on 5 providers. Overall, Claude Sonnet 4.5 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4.5 was developed to bridge human thinking and machine assistance, allowing people to work with language and tools in a more conversational and natural way. Built with a focus on turning ideas into results, it represents an evolution in making AI feel less mechanical while maintaining strong capabilities across reasoning, coding, and collaborative tasks.
Meta
Llama 3.2 90B was developed as a flagship-tier open-source model, designed to provide advanced capabilities with 90 billion parameters. Built to serve applications requiring high-quality reasoning and generation, it represents a powerful option within the Llama 3.2 series for demanding tasks.
1 year newer

Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25

Claude Sonnet 4.5
Anthropic
2025-09-29
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Claude Sonnet 4.5
2025-01-31
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude Sonnet 4.5
Anthropic
ZeroEval


Claude Sonnet 4.5

Llama 3.2 90B Instruct

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Bedrock
DeepInfra
Fireworks
Hyperbolic
Together