+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads with 39.2% higher average benchmark score. Claude Sonnet 4.5 is available on 2 providers. Overall, Claude Sonnet 4.5 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4.5 was developed to bridge human thinking and machine assistance, allowing people to work with language and tools in a more conversational and natural way. Built with a focus on turning ideas into results, it represents an evolution in making AI feel less mechanical while maintaining strong capabilities across reasoning, coding, and collaborative tasks.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct represents a further evolution of the Small model series, developed with continued refinements to instruction-following and task performance. Built to incorporate ongoing improvements, it provides the latest capabilities in Mistral's intermediate-scale offering.
3 months newer
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
Mistral AI
2025-06-20
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Anthropic
2025-09-29
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Average Score:83.4%(+39.2%)
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
Average Score:44.2%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
2023-10-01
Claude Sonnet 4.5
2025-01-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude Sonnet 4.5
2 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Avg Score:83.4%(+39.2%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
Avg Score:44.2%
Providers:0