Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads with 27.3% higher average benchmark score. Claude Sonnet 4.5 offers 232.0K more tokens in context window than Phi 4. Phi 4 is $17.79 cheaper per million tokens. Claude Sonnet 4.5 supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Claude Sonnet 4.5 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4.5 was developed to bridge human thinking and machine assistance, allowing people to work with language and tools in a more conversational and natural way. Built with a focus on turning ideas into results, it represents an evolution in making AI feel less mechanical while maintaining strong capabilities across reasoning, coding, and collaborative tasks.
Microsoft
Phi-4 was introduced as the fourth generation of Microsoft's small language model series, designed to push the boundaries of what compact models can achieve. Built with advanced training techniques and architectural improvements, it demonstrates continued progress in efficient, high-quality language models.
9 months newer

Phi 4
Microsoft
2024-12-12

Claude Sonnet 4.5
Anthropic
2025-09-29
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Phi 4
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Phi 4
Phi 4
2024-06-01
Claude Sonnet 4.5
2025-01-31
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude Sonnet 4.5
Anthropic
ZeroEval


Claude Sonnet 4.5

Phi 4

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Phi 4
Phi 4
DeepInfra