+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads with 31.4% higher average benchmark score. Claude Sonnet 4.5 supports multimodal inputs. Claude Sonnet 4.5 is available on 2 providers. Overall, Claude Sonnet 4.5 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4.5 was developed to bridge human thinking and machine assistance, allowing people to work with language and tools in a more conversational and natural way. Built with a focus on turning ideas into results, it represents an evolution in making AI feel less mechanical while maintaining strong capabilities across reasoning, coding, and collaborative tasks.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-4 Mini Reasoning was developed to incorporate extended thinking capabilities into the ultra-compact Phi-4 Mini architecture. Built to demonstrate that reasoning enhancements can be applied even to very small models, it brings analytical depth to resource-constrained environments.
5 months newer
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
Microsoft
2025-04-30
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Anthropic
2025-09-29
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Average Score:83.4%(+31.4%)
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
Average Score:52.0%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Claude Sonnet 4.5
2025-01-31
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
2025-02-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude Sonnet 4.5
2 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Avg Score:83.4%(+31.4%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
Avg Score:52.0%
Providers:0