+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Codestral-22B vs Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads with 15.3% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Codestral-22B is a language model developed by Mistral AI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 65.9% across 7 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HumanEvalFIM-Average (91.6%), HumanEval (81.1%), MBPP (78.2%). Released in 2024, it represents Mistral AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is a multimodal language model developed by Google. The model shows competitive results across 13 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH (86.8%), FACTS Grounding (83.6%), Global-MMLU-Lite (78.2%). With a 1.1M token context window, it can handle extensive documents and complex multi-turn conversations. The model is available through 1 API provider. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
8 months newer
Codestral-22B
Mistral AI
2024-05-29
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
2025-02-05
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 20 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Codestral-22B
Average Score:23.1%
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Average Score:38.3%(+15.3%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Codestral-22B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
1 providers
+
+
+
+
Codestral-22B
Avg Score:23.1%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Avg Score:38.3%(+15.3%)
Providers:1