+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Codestral-22B vs Gemma 3 27B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 3 27B leads with 1.4% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3 27B supports multimodal inputs. Gemma 3 27B is available on 2 providers. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Codestral 22B was developed as a specialized coding model from Mistral AI, designed to excel at code generation, completion, and understanding tasks. Built with 22 billion parameters optimized for programming, it serves developers requiring advanced assistance with software development across multiple programming languages.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B represents the largest variant in the Gemma 3 family, developed to provide flagship-level open-source capabilities. Built with advanced training methodologies and 27 billion parameters, it offers researchers and developers access to powerful language understanding without proprietary restrictions.
9 months newer
Codestral-22B
Mistral AI
2024-05-29
Gemma 3 27B
2025-03-12
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Codestral-22B
Average Score:79.7%
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Average Score:81.1%(+1.4%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Codestral-22B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
2 providers
DeepInfra
+
+
+
+
Codestral-22B
Avg Score:79.7%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Avg Score:81.1%(+1.4%)
Providers:2