+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Codestral-22B vs Gemma 3 4B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Codestral-22B leads with 12.4% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3 4B supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Codestral-22B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Codestral 22B was developed as a specialized coding model from Mistral AI, designed to excel at code generation, completion, and understanding tasks. Built with 22 billion parameters optimized for programming, it serves developers requiring advanced assistance with software development across multiple programming languages.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B was developed as a compact yet capable open-source model, designed to strike a balance between performance and resource efficiency. Built with 4 billion parameters and instruction tuning, it provides a practical option for applications requiring moderate capability with manageable computational costs.
9 months newer
Codestral-22B
Mistral AI
2024-05-29
Gemma 3 4B
2025-03-12
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Codestral-22B
Average Score:79.7%(+12.4%)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B
Average Score:67.3%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3 4B
2024-08-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Codestral-22B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B
1 providers
DeepInfra
+
+
+
+
Codestral-22B
Avg Score:79.7%(+12.4%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B
Avg Score:67.3%
Providers:1