+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Codestral-22B vs Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Codestral-22B leads with 18.1% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3n E2B Instructed supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Codestral-22B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Codestral 22B was developed as a specialized coding model from Mistral AI, designed to excel at code generation, completion, and understanding tasks. Built with 22 billion parameters optimized for programming, it serves developers requiring advanced assistance with software development across multiple programming languages.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E2B IT was developed as the instruction-tuned version of Gemma 3N E2B, designed to follow user instructions while maintaining edge-optimized efficiency. Built for applications requiring both compact size and reliable instruction-following, it extends conversational AI to resource-constrained environments.
1 year newer
Codestral-22B
Mistral AI
2024-05-29
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
2025-06-26
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Codestral-22B
Average Score:79.7%(+18.1%)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Average Score:61.5%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Codestral-22B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Codestral-22B
Avg Score:79.7%(+18.1%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Avg Score:61.5%
Providers:0