+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Codestral-22B vs IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview leads with 1.3% higher average benchmark score. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Codestral 22B was developed as a specialized coding model from Mistral AI, designed to excel at code generation, completion, and understanding tasks. Built with 22 billion parameters optimized for programming, it serves developers requiring advanced assistance with software development across multiple programming languages.
+
+
+
+
IBM
Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview was introduced as an experimental ultra-compact model, designed to demonstrate IBM's progress in efficient model development. Built to explore the boundaries of what small models can achieve for enterprise applications, it represents an early look at next-generation Granite capabilities.
11 months newer
Codestral-22B
Mistral AI
2024-05-29
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
IBM
2025-05-02
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Codestral-22B
Average Score:81.1%
+
+
+
+
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Average Score:82.4%(+1.3%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Codestral-22B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Codestral-22B
Avg Score:81.1%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Avg Score:82.4%(+1.3%)
Providers:0