+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Codestral-22B vs Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct leads with 36.8% higher average benchmark score. Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is available on 9 providers. Overall, Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Codestral-22B is a language model developed by Mistral AI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 65.9% across 7 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HumanEvalFIM-Average (91.6%), HumanEval (81.1%), MBPP (78.2%). Released in 2024, it represents Mistral AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is a language model developed by Meta. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.7% across 18 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM-8K (CoT) (95.1%), ARC-C (94.8%), API-Bank (90.0%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 9 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Meta's latest advancement in AI technology.
1 month newer
Codestral-22B
Mistral AI
2024-05-29
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Meta
2024-07-23
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 24 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Codestral-22B
Average Score:19.2%
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Average Score:56.0%(+36.8%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Codestral-22B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
9 providers
Bedrock
+
+
+
+
Codestral-22B
Avg Score:19.2%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Avg Score:56.0%(+36.8%)
Providers:9