+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Codestral-22B vs Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Codestral-22B leads with 8.5% higher average benchmark score. Llama 3.1 8B Instruct is available on 9 providers. Overall, Codestral-22B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Codestral 22B was developed as a specialized coding model from Mistral AI, designed to excel at code generation, completion, and understanding tasks. Built with 22 billion parameters optimized for programming, it serves developers requiring advanced assistance with software development across multiple programming languages.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.1 8B was developed as an efficient open-source model, designed to bring capable instruction-following to applications with limited computational resources. Built with 8 billion parameters, it provides a lightweight option for developers seeking reliable performance without the overhead of larger models.
1 month newer
Codestral-22B
Mistral AI
2024-05-29
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Meta
2024-07-23
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Codestral-22B
Average Score:81.1%(+8.5%)
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Average Score:72.6%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
2023-12-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Codestral-22B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
9 providers
Bedrock
+
+
+
+
Codestral-22B
Avg Score:81.1%(+8.5%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Avg Score:72.6%
Providers:9