+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Codestral-22B vs Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct leads with 23.3% higher average benchmark score. Llama 3.2 90B Instruct supports multimodal inputs. Llama 3.2 90B Instruct is available on 5 providers. Overall, Llama 3.2 90B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Codestral-22B is a language model developed by Mistral AI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 65.9% across 7 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HumanEvalFIM-Average (91.6%), HumanEval (81.1%), MBPP (78.2%). Released in 2024, it represents Mistral AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct is a multimodal language model developed by Meta. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 71.3% across 13 benchmarks. It excels particularly in AI2D (92.3%), DocVQA (90.1%), MGSM (86.9%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 5 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Meta's latest advancement in AI technology.
3 months newer
Codestral-22B
Mistral AI
2024-05-29
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 20 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Codestral-22B
Average Score:23.1%
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Average Score:46.3%(+23.3%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Codestral-22B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
5 providers
Bedrock
+
+
+
+
Codestral-22B
Avg Score:23.1%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Avg Score:46.3%(+23.3%)
Providers:5