+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Codestral-22B vs Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct leads with 17.2% higher average benchmark score. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is available on 9 providers. Overall, Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Codestral-22B is a language model developed by Mistral AI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 65.9% across 7 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HumanEvalFIM-Average (91.6%), HumanEval (81.1%), MBPP (78.2%). Released in 2024, it represents Mistral AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is a language model developed by Meta. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 79.9% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in IFEval (92.1%), MGSM (91.1%), HumanEval (88.4%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 9 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Meta's latest advancement in AI technology.
6 months newer
Codestral-22B
Mistral AI
2024-05-29
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Meta
2024-12-06
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 15 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Codestral-22B
Average Score:30.7%
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Average Score:47.9%(+17.2%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Codestral-22B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
9 providers
Bedrock
+
+
+
+
Codestral-22B
Avg Score:30.7%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Avg Score:47.9%(+17.2%)
Providers:9