+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Codestral-22B vs Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct leads with 7.3% higher average benchmark score. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is available on 9 providers. Overall, Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Codestral 22B was developed as a specialized coding model from Mistral AI, designed to excel at code generation, completion, and understanding tasks. Built with 22 billion parameters optimized for programming, it serves developers requiring advanced assistance with software development across multiple programming languages.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.3 70B was introduced with refinements to the Llama 3 architecture, designed to incorporate improvements in instruction-following and task performance. Built to continue the evolution of Meta's 70B tier, it provides enhanced quality while maintaining the deployment characteristics valued by the open-source community.
6 months newer
Codestral-22B
Mistral AI
2024-05-29
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Meta
2024-12-06
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Codestral-22B
Average Score:81.1%
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Average Score:88.4%(+7.3%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Codestral-22B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
9 providers
Bedrock
+
+
+
+
Codestral-22B
Avg Score:81.1%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Avg Score:88.4%(+7.3%)
Providers:9