+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Codestral-22B vs Phi-3.5-mini-instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Codestral-22B leads with 13.5% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Codestral-22B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Codestral 22B was developed as a specialized coding model from Mistral AI, designed to excel at code generation, completion, and understanding tasks. Built with 22 billion parameters optimized for programming, it serves developers requiring advanced assistance with software development across multiple programming languages.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-3.5 Mini was developed by Microsoft as a small language model designed to deliver impressive performance despite its compact size. Built with efficiency in mind, it demonstrates that capable language understanding and generation can be achieved with fewer parameters, making AI more accessible for edge and resource-constrained deployments.
2 months newer
Codestral-22B
Mistral AI
2024-05-29
Phi-3.5-mini-instruct
Microsoft
2024-08-23
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Codestral-22B
Average Score:79.7%(+13.5%)
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-mini-instruct
Average Score:66.2%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Codestral-22B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-mini-instruct
1 providers
Azure
+
+
+
+
Codestral-22B
Avg Score:79.7%(+13.5%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-mini-instruct
Avg Score:66.2%
Providers:1