+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Codestral-22B vs Phi 4
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Phi 4 leads with 20.9% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Phi 4 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Codestral-22B is a language model developed by Mistral AI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 65.9% across 7 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HumanEvalFIM-Average (91.6%), HumanEval (81.1%), MBPP (78.2%). Released in 2024, it represents Mistral AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi 4 is a language model developed by Microsoft. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 66.0% across 13 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MMLU (84.8%), HumanEval+ (82.8%), HumanEval (82.6%). The model is available through 1 API provider. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Microsoft's latest advancement in AI technology.
6 months newer
Codestral-22B
Mistral AI
2024-05-29
Phi 4
Microsoft
2024-12-12
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 19 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Codestral-22B
Average Score:24.3%
+
+
+
+
Phi 4
Average Score:45.2%(+20.9%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Phi 4
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Codestral-22B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Phi 4
1 providers
DeepInfra
+
+
+
+
Codestral-22B
Avg Score:24.3%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Phi 4
Avg Score:45.2%(+20.9%)
Providers:1