+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Command R+ vs DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Command R+ leads with 26.0% higher average benchmark score. Command R+ is available on 2 providers. Overall, Command R+ is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Cohere
Command R+ is a language model developed by Cohere. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.6% across 6 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HellaSwag (88.6%), Winogrande (85.4%), MMLU (75.7%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Cohere's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B is a language model developed by DeepSeek. The model shows competitive results across 4 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (83.9%), AIME 2024 (52.7%), GPQA (33.8%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents DeepSeek's latest advancement in AI technology.
4 months newer
Command R+
Cohere
2024-08-30
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B
DeepSeek
2025-01-20
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 10 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Average Score:44.8%(+26.0%)
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B
Average Score:18.7%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Command R+
2 providers
Bedrock
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Cohere
Throughput: 59 tok/s
Latency: 0.65ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Avg Score:44.8%(+26.0%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B
Avg Score:18.7%
Providers:0