+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Command R+ vs DeepSeek-V3 0324
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Command R+ leads with 8.7% higher average benchmark score. DeepSeek-V3 0324 offers 71.7K more tokens in context window than Command R+. Both models have similar pricing. Overall, Command R+ is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Cohere
Command R+ is a language model developed by Cohere. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.6% across 6 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HellaSwag (88.6%), Winogrande (85.4%), MMLU (75.7%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Cohere's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3 0324 is a language model developed by DeepSeek. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 70.4% across 5 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (94.0%), MMLU-Pro (81.2%), GPQA (68.4%). It supports a 328K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. Released in 2025, it represents DeepSeek's latest advancement in AI technology.
6 months newer
Command R+
Cohere
2024-08-30
DeepSeek-V3 0324
DeepSeek
2025-03-25
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Input:$0.25
Output:$1.00($0.17 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3 0324
Input:$0.28
Output:$1.14
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 11 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Average Score:40.7%(+8.7%)
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3 0324
Average Score:32.0%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Command R+
2 providers
Bedrock
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Cohere
Throughput: 59 tok/s
Latency: 0.65ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Avg Score:40.7%(+8.7%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3 0324
Avg Score:32.0%
Providers:1