Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek VL2 leads with 27.2% higher average benchmark score. DeepSeek VL2 offers 2.6K more tokens in context window than Command R+. Command R+ is $4808.25 cheaper per million tokens. DeepSeek VL2 supports multimodal inputs. Overall, DeepSeek VL2 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Cohere
Command R+ is a language model developed by Cohere. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.6% across 6 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HellaSwag (88.6%), Winogrande (85.4%), MMLU (75.7%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Cohere's latest advancement in AI technology.
DeepSeek
DeepSeek VL2 is a multimodal language model developed by DeepSeek. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 70.9% across 14 benchmarks. It excels particularly in DocVQA (93.3%), ChartQA (86.0%), TextVQA (84.2%). It supports a 259K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents DeepSeek's latest advancement in AI technology.
3 months newer
Command R+
Cohere
2024-08-30
DeepSeek VL2
DeepSeek
2024-12-13
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Command R+
DeepSeek VL2
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 20 common benchmarks
Command R+
DeepSeek VL2
Available providers and their performance metrics
Command R+
Bedrock
Cohere
Command R+
DeepSeek VL2
Command R+
DeepSeek VL2
DeepSeek VL2
Replicate