+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Command R+ vs Devstral Small 1.1
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Command R+ leads with 56.3% higher average benchmark score. Devstral Small 1.1 is $0.85 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Command R+ is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Cohere
Command R+ is a language model developed by Cohere. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.6% across 6 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HellaSwag (88.6%), Winogrande (85.4%), MMLU (75.7%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Cohere's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Devstral Small 1.1 is a language model developed by Mistral AI. The model shows competitive results across 1 benchmarks. Notable strengths include SWE-Bench Verified (53.6%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Mistral AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
10 months newer
Command R+
Cohere
2024-08-30
Devstral Small 1.1
Mistral AI
2025-07-11
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Input:$0.25
Output:$1.00
+
+
+
+
Devstral Small 1.1
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.30($0.85 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 7 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Average Score:64.0%(+56.3%)
+
+
+
+
Devstral Small 1.1
Average Score:7.7%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Command R+
2 providers
Bedrock
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Cohere
Throughput: 59 tok/s
Latency: 0.65ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Avg Score:64.0%(+56.3%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Devstral Small 1.1
Avg Score:7.7%
Providers:1