+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Command R+ vs Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Command R+ leads with 25.0% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking supports multimodal inputs. Command R+ is available on 2 providers. Overall, Command R+ is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Cohere
Command R+ is a language model developed by Cohere. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.6% across 6 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HellaSwag (88.6%), Winogrande (85.4%), MMLU (75.7%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Cohere's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is a multimodal language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.3% across 3 benchmarks. Notable strengths include MMMU (75.4%), GPQA (74.2%), AIME 2024 (73.3%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
4 months newer
Command R+
Cohere
2024-08-30
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
2025-01-21
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 9 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Average Score:49.7%(+25.0%)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Average Score:24.8%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
2024-08-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Command R+
2 providers
Bedrock
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Cohere
Throughput: 59 tok/s
Latency: 0.65ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Avg Score:49.7%(+25.0%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Avg Score:24.8%
Providers:0