+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Command R+ vs Gemma 2 27B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 2 27B leads with 38.7% higher average benchmark score. Command R+ is available on 2 providers. Overall, Gemma 2 27B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Cohere
Command R+ is a language model developed by Cohere. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.6% across 6 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HellaSwag (88.6%), Winogrande (85.4%), MMLU (75.7%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Cohere's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B is a language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 69.1% across 16 benchmarks. It excels particularly in ARC-E (88.6%), HellaSwag (86.4%), BoolQ (84.8%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
2 months newer
Gemma 2 27B
2024-06-27
Command R+
Cohere
2024-08-30
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 17 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Average Score:26.3%
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
Average Score:65.1%(+38.7%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Command R+
2 providers
Bedrock
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Cohere
Throughput: 59 tok/s
Latency: 0.65ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Avg Score:26.3%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
Avg Score:65.1%(+38.7%)
Providers:0