+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Command R+ vs Gemma 3 1B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 3 1B leads with 3.9% higher average benchmark score. Command R+ is available on 2 providers. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Cohere
Command R+ is a language model developed by Cohere. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.6% across 6 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HellaSwag (88.6%), Winogrande (85.4%), MMLU (75.7%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Cohere's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B is a language model developed by Google. The model shows competitive results across 18 benchmarks. It excels particularly in IFEval (80.2%), GSM8k (62.8%), Natural2Code (56.0%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
6 months newer
Command R+
Cohere
2024-08-30
Gemma 3 1B
2025-03-12
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 23 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Average Score:19.5%
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B
Average Score:23.4%(+3.9%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Command R+
2 providers
Bedrock
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Cohere
Throughput: 59 tok/s
Latency: 0.65ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Avg Score:19.5%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B
Avg Score:23.4%(+3.9%)
Providers:0