+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Command R+ vs GPT-3.5 Turbo
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Command R+ leads with 8.4% higher average benchmark score. Command R+ offers 235.5K more tokens in context window than GPT-3.5 Turbo. Command R+ is $0.75 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Command R+ is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Cohere
Command R+ is a language model developed by Cohere. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.6% across 6 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HellaSwag (88.6%), Winogrande (85.4%), MMLU (75.7%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Cohere's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-3.5 Turbo is a language model developed by OpenAI. The model shows competitive results across 8 benchmarks. Notable strengths include DROP (70.2%), MMLU (69.8%), HumanEval (68.0%). The model is available through 2 API providers.
1 year newer
GPT-3.5 Turbo
OpenAI
2023-03-21
Command R+
Cohere
2024-08-30
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Input:$0.25
Output:$1.00($0.75 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
GPT-3.5 Turbo
Input:$0.50
Output:$1.50
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 13 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Average Score:34.4%(+8.4%)
+
+
+
+
GPT-3.5 Turbo
Average Score:26.0%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-3.5 Turbo
2021-09-30
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Command R+
2 providers
Bedrock
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Cohere
Throughput: 59 tok/s
Latency: 0.65ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Avg Score:34.4%(+8.4%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
GPT-3.5 Turbo
Avg Score:26.0%
Providers:2