+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Command R+ vs GPT-4o
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT-4o leads with 13.2% higher average benchmark score. Command R+ offers 123.9K more tokens in context window than GPT-4o. Command R+ is $11.25 cheaper per million tokens. GPT-4o supports multimodal inputs. Overall, GPT-4o is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Cohere
Command R+ is a language model developed by Cohere. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.6% across 6 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HellaSwag (88.6%), Winogrande (85.4%), MMLU (75.7%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Cohere's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-4o is a multimodal language model developed by OpenAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 77.4% across 8 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MGSM (90.5%), HumanEval (90.2%), MMLU (88.7%). It supports a 132K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents OpenAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
3 months newer
GPT-4o
OpenAI
2024-05-13
Command R+
Cohere
2024-08-30
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Input:$0.25
Output:$1.00($11.25 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
Input:$2.50
Output:$10.00
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 13 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Average Score:34.4%
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
Average Score:47.6%(+13.2%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Command R+
2 providers
Bedrock
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Cohere
Throughput: 59 tok/s
Latency: 0.65ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Avg Score:34.4%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
Avg Score:47.6%(+13.2%)
Providers:2