Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Command R+ leads with 1.3% higher average benchmark score. GPT OSS 120B offers 6.1K more tokens in context window than Command R+. GPT OSS 120B is $0.71 cheaper per million tokens. GPT OSS 120B is available on 5 providers. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
Cohere
Command R+ is a language model developed by Cohere. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.6% across 6 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HellaSwag (88.6%), Winogrande (85.4%), MMLU (75.7%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Cohere's latest advancement in AI technology.
OpenAI
GPT OSS 120B is a language model developed by OpenAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 61.7% across 7 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MMLU (90.0%), CodeForces (87.4%), GPQA (80.1%). It supports a 262K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 5 API providers. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents OpenAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
11 months newer
Command R+
Cohere
2024-08-30
GPT OSS 120B
OpenAI
2025-08-05
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Command R+
GPT OSS 120B
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 12 common benchmarks
Command R+
GPT OSS 120B
Available providers and their performance metrics
Command R+
Bedrock
Cohere
Command R+
GPT OSS 120B
Command R+
GPT OSS 120B
GPT OSS 120B
DeepInfra
Groq
Novita
OpenAI
ZeroEval