+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Command R+ vs GPT OSS 20B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Command R+ leads with 6.8% higher average benchmark score. GPT OSS 20B offers 6.1K more tokens in context window than Command R+. GPT OSS 20B is $1.00 cheaper per million tokens. GPT OSS 20B is available on 4 providers. Overall, Command R+ is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Cohere
Command R+ is a language model developed by Cohere. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.6% across 6 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HellaSwag (88.6%), Winogrande (85.4%), MMLU (75.7%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Cohere's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT OSS 20B is a language model developed by OpenAI. The model shows competitive results across 7 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MMLU (85.3%), CodeForces (83.9%), GPQA (71.5%). It supports a 262K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 4 API providers. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents OpenAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
11 months newer
Command R+
Cohere
2024-08-30
GPT OSS 20B
OpenAI
2025-08-05
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Input:$0.25
Output:$1.00
+
+
+
+
GPT OSS 20B
Input:$0.05
Output:$0.20($1.00 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 12 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Average Score:37.3%(+6.8%)
+
+
+
+
GPT OSS 20B
Average Score:30.5%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Command R+
2 providers
Bedrock
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Cohere
Throughput: 59 tok/s
Latency: 0.65ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Avg Score:37.3%(+6.8%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
GPT OSS 20B
Avg Score:30.5%
Providers:4