+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Command R+ vs IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview leads with 15.8% higher average benchmark score. Command R+ is available on 2 providers. Overall, IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Cohere
Command R+ is a language model developed by Cohere. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.6% across 6 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HellaSwag (88.6%), Winogrande (85.4%), MMLU (75.7%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Cohere's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
IBM
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is a language model developed by IBM. The model shows competitive results across 12 benchmarks. It excels particularly in AttaQ (86.1%), HumanEval (82.4%), HumanEval+ (78.3%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents IBM's latest advancement in AI technology.
8 months newer
Command R+
Cohere
2024-08-30
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
IBM
2025-05-02
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 15 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Average Score:29.8%
+
+
+
+
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Average Score:45.7%(+15.8%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Command R+
2 providers
Bedrock
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Cohere
Throughput: 59 tok/s
Latency: 0.65ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Avg Score:29.8%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Avg Score:45.7%(+15.8%)
Providers:0