+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Command R+ vs Grok-1.5V
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Grok-1.5V leads with 4.3% higher average benchmark score. Grok-1.5V supports multimodal inputs. Command R+ is available on 2 providers. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Cohere
Command R+ is a language model developed by Cohere. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.6% across 6 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HellaSwag (88.6%), Winogrande (85.4%), MMLU (75.7%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Cohere's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok-1.5V is a multimodal language model developed by xAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 71.9% across 7 benchmarks. It excels particularly in AI2D (88.3%), DocVQA (85.6%), TextVQA (78.1%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents xAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
4 months newer
Grok-1.5V
xAI
2024-04-12
Command R+
Cohere
2024-08-30
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 13 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Average Score:34.4%
+
+
+
+
Grok-1.5V
Average Score:38.7%(+4.3%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Command R+
2 providers
Bedrock
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Cohere
Throughput: 59 tok/s
Latency: 0.65ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Avg Score:34.4%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Grok-1.5V
Avg Score:38.7%(+4.3%)
Providers:0