+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Command R+ vs Grok Code Fast 1
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Command R+ leads with 53.8% higher average benchmark score. Grok Code Fast 1 offers 10.0K more tokens in context window than Command R+. Both models have similar pricing. Overall, Command R+ is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Cohere
Command R+ is a language model developed by Cohere. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.6% across 6 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HellaSwag (88.6%), Winogrande (85.4%), MMLU (75.7%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Cohere's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok Code Fast 1 is a language model developed by xAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 70.8% across 1 benchmarks. Notable strengths include SWE-Bench Verified (70.8%). It supports a 266K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. Released in 2025, it represents xAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
12 months newer
Command R+
Cohere
2024-08-30
Grok Code Fast 1
xAI
2025-08-28
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Input:$0.25
Output:$1.00($0.45 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
Grok Code Fast 1
Input:$0.20
Output:$1.50
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 7 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Average Score:64.0%(+53.8%)
+
+
+
+
Grok Code Fast 1
Average Score:10.1%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Command R+
2 providers
Bedrock
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Cohere
Throughput: 59 tok/s
Latency: 0.65ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Avg Score:64.0%(+53.8%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Grok Code Fast 1
Avg Score:10.1%
Providers:1