+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Command R+ vs Kimi K2 0905
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Kimi K2 0905 leads with 5.1% higher average benchmark score. Kimi K2 0905 offers 268.3K more tokens in context window than Command R+. Command R+ is $1.85 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Kimi K2 0905 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Cohere
Command R+ is a language model developed by Cohere. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.6% across 6 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HellaSwag (88.6%), Winogrande (85.4%), MMLU (75.7%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Cohere's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2 0905 is a language model developed by Moonshot AI. This model demonstrates exceptional performance with an average score of 84.0% across 6 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HumanEval (94.5%), MMLU (90.2%), MATH (89.1%). It supports a 524K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. Released in 2025, it represents Moonshot AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
1 year newer
Command R+
Cohere
2024-08-30
Kimi K2 0905
Moonshot AI
2025-09-05
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Input:$0.25
Output:$1.00($1.85 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 0905
Input:$0.60
Output:$2.50
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 11 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Average Score:40.7%
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 0905
Average Score:45.8%(+5.1%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Command R+
2 providers
Bedrock
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Cohere
Throughput: 59 tok/s
Latency: 0.65ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Avg Score:40.7%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 0905
Avg Score:45.8%(+5.1%)
Providers:2