+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Command R+ vs Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct leads with 40.8% higher average benchmark score. Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is $0.85 cheaper per million tokens. Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is available on 9 providers. Overall, Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Cohere
Command R+ is a language model developed by Cohere. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.6% across 6 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HellaSwag (88.6%), Winogrande (85.4%), MMLU (75.7%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Cohere's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is a language model developed by Meta. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.7% across 18 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM-8K (CoT) (95.1%), ARC-C (94.8%), API-Bank (90.0%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 9 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Meta's latest advancement in AI technology.
1 month newer
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Meta
2024-07-23
Command R+
Cohere
2024-08-30
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Input:$0.25
Output:$1.00
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Input:$0.20
Output:$0.20($0.85 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 22 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Average Score:20.3%
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Average Score:61.1%(+40.8%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Command R+
2 providers
Bedrock
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Cohere
Throughput: 59 tok/s
Latency: 0.65ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Avg Score:20.3%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Avg Score:61.1%(+40.8%)
Providers:9