+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Command R+ vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct leads with 27.2% higher average benchmark score. Command R+ is available on 2 providers. Overall, Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Cohere
Command R+ is a language model developed by Cohere. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.6% across 6 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HellaSwag (88.6%), Winogrande (85.4%), MMLU (75.7%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Cohere's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct is a language model developed by NVIDIA. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 67.9% across 11 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (91.4%), HellaSwag (85.6%), Winogrande (84.5%). Released in 2024, it represents NVIDIA's latest advancement in AI technology.
1 month newer
Command R+
Cohere
2024-08-30
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
NVIDIA
2024-10-01
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 11 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Average Score:40.7%
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Average Score:67.9%(+27.2%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
2023-12-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Command R+
2 providers
Bedrock
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Cohere
Throughput: 59 tok/s
Latency: 0.65ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Avg Score:40.7%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Avg Score:67.9%(+27.2%)
Providers:0