+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Command R+ vs Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct leads with 22.7% higher average benchmark score. Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is $1.22 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Cohere
Command R+ is a language model developed by Cohere. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.6% across 6 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HellaSwag (88.6%), Winogrande (85.4%), MMLU (75.7%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Cohere's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is a language model developed by Meta. The model shows competitive results across 15 benchmarks. It excels particularly in NIH/Multi-needle (84.7%), ARC-C (78.6%), GSM8k (77.7%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. Released in 2024, it represents Meta's latest advancement in AI technology.
26 days newer
Command R+
Cohere
2024-08-30
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Input:$0.25
Output:$1.00
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Input:$0.01
Output:$0.02($1.22 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 17 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Average Score:26.3%
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Average Score:49.1%(+22.7%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Command R+
2 providers
Bedrock
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Cohere
Throughput: 59 tok/s
Latency: 0.65ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Avg Score:26.3%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Avg Score:49.1%(+22.7%)
Providers:1