+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Command R+ vs Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 leads with 9.2% higher average benchmark score. Command R+ is available on 2 providers. Overall, Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Cohere
Command R+ is a language model developed by Cohere. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.6% across 6 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HellaSwag (88.6%), Winogrande (85.4%), MMLU (75.7%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Cohere's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
NVIDIA
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 is a language model developed by NVIDIA. This model demonstrates exceptional performance with an average score of 81.0% across 7 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (96.6%), MT-Bench (91.7%), MBPP (91.3%). Released in 2025, it represents NVIDIA's latest advancement in AI technology.
6 months newer
Command R+
Cohere
2024-08-30
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
NVIDIA
2025-03-18
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 13 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Average Score:34.4%
+
+
+
+
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
Average Score:43.6%(+9.2%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
2023-12-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Command R+
2 providers
Bedrock
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Cohere
Throughput: 59 tok/s
Latency: 0.65ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Avg Score:34.4%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
Avg Score:43.6%(+9.2%)
Providers:0