+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Command R+ vs Magistral Medium
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Command R+ leads with 11.0% higher average benchmark score. Magistral Medium supports multimodal inputs. Command R+ is available on 2 providers. Overall, Command R+ is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Cohere
Command R+ is a language model developed by Cohere. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.6% across 6 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HellaSwag (88.6%), Winogrande (85.4%), MMLU (75.7%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Cohere's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Magistral Medium is a multimodal language model developed by Mistral AI. The model shows competitive results across 6 benchmarks. Notable strengths include AIME 2024 (73.6%), GPQA (70.8%), AIME 2025 (64.9%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Mistral AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
9 months newer
Command R+
Cohere
2024-08-30
Magistral Medium
Mistral AI
2025-06-10
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 12 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Average Score:37.3%(+11.0%)
+
+
+
+
Magistral Medium
Average Score:26.3%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Magistral Medium
2025-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Command R+
2 providers
Bedrock
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Cohere
Throughput: 59 tok/s
Latency: 0.65ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Avg Score:37.3%(+11.0%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Magistral Medium
Avg Score:26.3%
Providers:0