+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Command R+ vs Magistral Small 2506
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Command R+ leads with 19.5% higher average benchmark score. Command R+ is available on 2 providers. Overall, Command R+ is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Cohere
Command R+ is a language model developed by Cohere. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.6% across 6 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HellaSwag (88.6%), Winogrande (85.4%), MMLU (75.7%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Cohere's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Magistral Small 2506 is a language model developed by Mistral AI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 63.2% across 4 benchmarks. Notable strengths include AIME 2024 (70.7%), GPQA (68.2%), AIME 2025 (62.8%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Mistral AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
9 months newer
Command R+
Cohere
2024-08-30
Magistral Small 2506
Mistral AI
2025-06-10
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 10 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Average Score:44.8%(+19.5%)
+
+
+
+
Magistral Small 2506
Average Score:25.3%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Magistral Small 2506
2025-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Command R+
2 providers
Bedrock
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Cohere
Throughput: 59 tok/s
Latency: 0.65ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Avg Score:44.8%(+19.5%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Magistral Small 2506
Avg Score:25.3%
Providers:0