+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Command R+ vs MedGemma 4B IT
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Command R+ leads with 2.9% higher average benchmark score. MedGemma 4B IT supports multimodal inputs. Command R+ is available on 2 providers. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Cohere
Command R+ is a language model developed by Cohere. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.6% across 6 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HellaSwag (88.6%), Winogrande (85.4%), MMLU (75.7%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Cohere's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
MedGemma 4B IT is a multimodal language model developed by Google. The model shows competitive results across 7 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MIMIC CXR (88.9%), DermMCQA (71.8%), PathMCQA (69.8%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
8 months newer
Command R+
Cohere
2024-08-30
MedGemma 4B IT
2025-05-20
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 13 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Average Score:34.4%(+2.9%)
+
+
+
+
MedGemma 4B IT
Average Score:31.5%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Command R+
2 providers
Bedrock
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Cohere
Throughput: 59 tok/s
Latency: 0.65ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Avg Score:34.4%(+2.9%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
MedGemma 4B IT
Avg Score:31.5%
Providers:0