+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Command R+ vs Mistral Large 2
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Command R+ leads with 1.1% higher average benchmark score. Command R+ is $6.75 cheaper per million tokens. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Cohere
Command R+ is a language model developed by Cohere. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.6% across 6 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HellaSwag (88.6%), Winogrande (85.4%), MMLU (75.7%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Cohere's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Large 2 is a language model developed by Mistral AI. This model demonstrates exceptional performance with an average score of 87.6% across 5 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (93.0%), HumanEval (92.0%), MT-Bench (86.3%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Mistral AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
1 month newer
Mistral Large 2
Mistral AI
2024-07-24
Command R+
Cohere
2024-08-30
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Input:$0.25
Output:$1.00($6.75 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
Mistral Large 2
Input:$2.00
Output:$6.00
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 9 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Average Score:49.7%(+1.1%)
+
+
+
+
Mistral Large 2
Average Score:48.7%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Command R+
2 providers
Bedrock
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Cohere
Throughput: 59 tok/s
Latency: 0.65ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Avg Score:49.7%(+1.1%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Mistral Large 2
Avg Score:48.7%
Providers:2