+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Command R+ vs Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct leads with 9.2% higher average benchmark score. Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct supports multimodal inputs. Command R+ is available on 2 providers. Overall, Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Cohere
Command R+ is a language model developed by Cohere. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.6% across 6 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HellaSwag (88.6%), Winogrande (85.4%), MMLU (75.7%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Cohere's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct is a multimodal language model developed by Mistral AI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 64.0% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HumanEval (88.4%), MMLU (80.6%), TriviaQA (80.5%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Mistral AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
6 months newer
Command R+
Cohere
2024-08-30
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
Mistral AI
2025-03-17
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 14 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Average Score:32.0%
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
Average Score:41.1%(+9.2%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Command R+
2 providers
Bedrock
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Cohere
Throughput: 59 tok/s
Latency: 0.65ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Avg Score:32.0%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
Avg Score:41.1%(+9.2%)
Providers:0